The Dutch election campaigns were world news….on Twitter. Political leaders of various parties discussed on RTL, a commercial broadcaster, the political problems ranging from economic issues like the government deficit to the integration of minorities. The public responded to these debates on Twitter, using the hashtag #rtldebat.Twitterati were just commenting on the debates; expressing one liners, informing others about the debates, referring to news about the debates on other media etc. The number of tweets was so big that the topic became a trending topic, reaching at his peak more than 10.000 tweets per hour. That is 3 per second. In two hours (from 20.30-22.30) 7000 persons sent 30.000 tweets. (http://twittermania.nl/2010/05/twitter-de-ban-van-premiersdebat/) The response of the politicians in this debate on Twitter was small, none of the politicians answered the tweets.
Academic research about Twitter reveals some important characteristics of the topology of the social network. The impression that the tweets are sent from a closely connected network, representing a virtual community is wrong. Participants are sending there tweets to followers. These followers could respond, re-sent the message, or send their own. But the questions is whether this process of communication represents a debate within a structured community?

Read the rest of this entry »